1986 AC Ace vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (291 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (276 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ace | Lancer |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 406 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4496 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |