1986 Acura Integra vs. 2005 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2005 Lancia Zeta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lancia Zeta (135 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lancia Zeta (186 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2005 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Acura Integra | 2005 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Acura | Lancia |
| Model | Integra | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4285 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1665 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2830 mm |
