1986 Acura Integra vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota RAV4 (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Because 2012 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota RAV4 (233 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Acura Integra | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | Integra | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4285 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1665 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2659 mm |