1986 Acura Integra vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (113 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Acura Integra | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Acura | Kia |
Model | Integra | RIO |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4285 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1665 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |