1986 Acura Integra vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Acura Integra | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | Integra | XC60 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4355 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1665 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2774 mm |