1986 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 (116 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 150 kg more than 1986 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Alfa Romeo 33. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 (150 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 33 | CJ2A |
Year Released | 1986 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1717 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |