1986 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,961 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 33 | 626 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1961 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2520 mm |