1986 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1986 Alfa Romeo 33. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Alfa Romeo 33. (111 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Alfa Romeo 33.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 33 | UTE |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |