1986 Alfa Romeo 75 vs. 1990 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 (152 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1990 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 (225 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo 75 | 1990 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 75 | ES |
Year Released | 1986 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2470 mm |