1986 Alfa Romeo 75 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 (156 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 135 kg more than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75.
Because 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. (209 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo 75 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 75 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 80 L |