1986 Alfa Romeo 75 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1234 kg more than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Alfa Romeo 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Alfa Romeo 75 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
| Model | 75 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.5 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |
