1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud would be higher. At 1,351 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (85 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 82 kg more than 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (111 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Alfasud | Midge |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |