1986 Alfa Romeo Arna vs. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 690 kg more than 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna.
Because 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna has manual transmission. 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Alfa Romeo Arna | 1980 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | Arna | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1185 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2870 mm |