1986 Alfa Romeo Arna vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 188 more horse power than 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 800 kg more than 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna. (88 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Alfa Romeo Arna.

Compare all specifications: