1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato would be higher. At 5,340 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato. (432 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato (534 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Aston Martin V8 Zagato | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
| Model | V8 Zagato | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5340 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 432 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 534 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |
