1986 Audi 100 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,921 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 100 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1921 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |
