1986 Audi 100 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,921 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 504 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | 100 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1921 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 33 L |
