1986 Audi 100 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 309 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (180 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | 100 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |