1986 Audi 100 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,921 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1986 Audi 100. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 468 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 100 | Elan |
Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1921 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 72.7 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 702 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1170 mm |