1986 Audi 100 vs. 1980 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 1980 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Audi | Daihatsu |
Model | 100 | Taft |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2030 mm |