1986 Audi 100 vs. 1982 Bitter SC
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Bitter SC (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1986 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bitter SC weights approximately 490 kg more than 1986 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Bitter SC (248 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 1982 Bitter SC | |
| Make | Audi | Bitter |
| Model | 100 | SC |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 69.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2690 mm |
