1986 Audi 100 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 304 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (180 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 100 | Colt |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2390 mm |