1986 Audi 100 vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1986 Audi 100 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (85 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1986 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2420 mm |