1986 Audi 100 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 100.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 100 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2210 mm |