1986 Audi 100 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 496 kg more than 1986 Audi 100.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (180 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |