1986 Audi 100 vs. 2002 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 254 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (180 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada Samara II. (111 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 2002 Lada Samara II | |
| Make | Audi | Lada |
| Model | 100 | Samara II |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |
