1986 Audi 100 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,812 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 250 kg more than 1986 Audi 100.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Condor |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1812 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |