1986 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.

Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Audi 100 2009 Smart ForTwo
Make Audi Smart
Model 100 ForTwo
Year Released 1986 2009
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1588 cc 1000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 122 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.6 mm 72 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 81.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.2:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 2700 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 1870 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 33 L