1986 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,361 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Audi 100. (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 131 kg more than 1986 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (180 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |