1986 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Cube weights approximately 93 kg more than 1986 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (180 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Cube |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |