1986 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (122 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | 100 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
