1986 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Swift is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,921 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 2010 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | 100 | Swift |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1921 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2430 mm |
