1986 Audi 100 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 100 (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 100 weights approximately 22 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (180 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Audi | Honda |
| Model | 100 | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2436 mm |
