1986 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Audi 100. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 100 (139 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Micra |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |