1986 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1986 Audi 100. (138 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 232 kg more than 1986 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (320 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 100 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 100 | C30 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 1456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2639 mm |