1986 Audi 100 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 100 would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 100. (122 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 100. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1986 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1986 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 100 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Audi | Smart |
| Model | 100 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1867 mm |
