1986 Audi 200 vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 848 kg more than 1964 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 200 | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | 200 | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 58 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 38 L |
