1986 Audi 200 vs. 1964 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 200 | 1964 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
| Make | Audi | Willys-Overland |
| Model | 200 | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2280 mm |
