1986 Audi 200 vs. 1969 Chevrolet Nova
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 1969 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 200 | 1969 Chevrolet Nova | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Nova |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 76 L |
