1986 Audi 200 vs. 1970 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: