1986 Audi 200 vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Audi | Seat |
Model | 200 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2460 mm |