1986 Audi 200 vs. 1983 Dodge Charger

To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1983 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (161 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Audi 200 1983 Dodge Charger
Make Audi Dodge
Model 200 Charger
Year Released 1986 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2144 cc 2213 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 180 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 252 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1070 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2460 mm