1986 Audi 200 vs. 1984 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 470 kg more than 1986 Audi 200.
Because 1984 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1984 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1986 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3090 mm |