1986 Audi 200 vs. 1984 Dodge Colt
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Colt. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1984 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1984 Dodge Colt | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | 200 | Colt |
Year Released | 1986 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |