1986 Audi 200 vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4690 mm |