1986 Audi 200 vs. 1984 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1986 Audi 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1984 Lancia Beta. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1984 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 200 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1984 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1984 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Audi | Lancia |
Model | 200 | Beta |
Year Released | 1986 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 59 L |