1986 Audi 200 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, both 1986 Audi 200 and 1986 Ford Ranger were released in the same year (1986). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1986 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1986 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |