1986 Audi 200 vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR-11
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (741 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 561 more horse power than 1986 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 200.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR-11. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (800 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 548 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 200 | XJR-11 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 741 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1020 mm |