1986 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 200 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1986 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 890 kg more than 1986 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 200. (252 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 200 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 200 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 132 L |
