1986 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1986 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 440 kg more than 1986 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 200. (252 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 200 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 87 L |